A critical examination of PNP’s campaign failures
Dear Editor,
Mark Golding’s recent admission of the difficulties he faces as leader of the People’s National Party (PNP) starkly highlights the party’s failures and the shaky foundation upon which it has built its current campaign.
The latest Don Anderson and Bluedot scientific polls have laid bare the precarious position of both Golding and the PNP, revealing a decline in popularity that cannot be ignored. This decline is not merely a statistical blip, it reflects a broader failure of leadership and strategy that has come back to haunt them.
Golding’s reaction to the polling results, characterised by panic and frustration, underscores a leader who is acutely aware that unseating the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) is far from a given. The PNP’s inability to resonate with the electorate is a damning indictment of its messaging and strategy. Rather than addressing the real issues facing Jamaicans, Golding has resorted to attacking the credibility of the polls and the media, making baseless claims that the JLP has manipulated public perception. Such desperation reveals a party that has lost its way, relying on false premises that have ultimately backfired.
His allegations of government corruption and power hunger are particularly troubling, as Golding has repeatedly failed to substantiate these claims with concrete evidence. His inability to name specific government officials involved in corruption raises serious questions about the integrity of his accusations. Until he can provide verifiable proof, his rhetoric appears hollow and lacks the merit necessary to sway public opinion.
Moreover, Golding’s insinuations that the Government is propped up by elites and the media is compromised are not only unfounded but also reminiscent of a troubling historical pattern within the PNP. This behaviour echoes the tactics employed during the 1970s when the PNP, unable to deliver on its promises, resorted to attacking the business community and the free press in a desperate bid to maintain power. The infamous march led by then-Prime Minister Michael Manley on The Gleaner, during which he threatened the publication and its writers, serves as a cautionary tale of how the PNP has historically reacted when cornered.
In the lead-up to the local government elections, it was painfully clear that Golding and the PNP struggled to communicate effectively with voters, while the JLP seemed to be in a state of dormancy. However, the political landscape has shifted dramatically. The JLP’s revitalised public relations machinery now presents a formidable challenge for Golding, who finds himself scrambling to regain lost ground.
Golding’s claims that the Anderson poll was funded by a group of businessmen only serve to further erode his credibility. This raises serious questions: How does he know this? Is he merely speculating, or is there a deeper connection? His assertions reflect a troubling lack of accountability and transparency, further alienating potential supporters.
It is becoming increasingly apparent that Golding is under immense pressure, and doubts about his viability as PNP president are mounting. The PNP’s foundation, built on false premises and misleading narratives, has crumbled, leaving Golding scrambling for relevance. As the political landscape continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether he can rise to the occasion or if his leadership will falter under the weight of scrutiny and expectation.
The time has come for Golding and the PNP to answer the critical question that is being asked by many Jamaicans, including PNP supporters: What are your plans for Jamaica should your party win the next election?
The PNP has a troubling history of winning elections without providing a clear manifesto to the Jamaican people. This pattern dates back to 1967 when it failed to present a manifesto or campaign on a concrete plan. There was no manifesto in 1972, none in 1976, none in 1980, none in 1986, and none in 1989. This outdated notion that it can continue to win elections based on false narratives must stop. The people deserve to know what they are voting for.
As the PNP grapples with its failures, it must confront the reality that transparency, accountability, and a clear vision for the future are essential to regaining the trust of the Jamaican electorate. The time for empty rhetoric has passed; the Jamaican people deserve a party that stands on solid ground, one that offers genuine solutions for their future.
Christopher McCurdy
Kristophe60@hotmail.com